Best Phones Under ₹40,000

The sub-₹40,000 segment is where the value math gets interesting. It sits just below the flagship-killer tier, which means you are choosing between phones that each made a deliberate bet, one on cameras, one on sustained gaming, one on a battery that refuses to die, rather than phones that try to do everything. In my testing, a ₹37,000 phone posted a GPU score within a whisker of the class leader, another lasted more than 24 hours on a charge, and a third held frame rates under load that phones costing more could not. Knowing which bet each phone made is how you buy well here.

To find which phones genuinely earn a spot on a ₹40,000 shortlist, I ran ten devices through identical benchmark, gaming, stress, thermal and battery tests. The awards below reflect where each phone’s real strengths lie.

Phones Considered

I tested ten phones under ₹40,000: the Motorola Edge 70 Pro, POCO X8 Pro, OnePlus Nord CE6, Redmi Turbo 5, Realme GT 7T, Nothing Phone 4a, Realme 15 Pro, Realme 16, Redmi Note 15, and the Infinix Note 60 Pro.

Top Picks At A Glance

The recommendations below are based on in-house XP Lab testing and verified hardware specifications. Refer to the comparison table for a side-by-side view.

Category My Pick Price Why We Picked It
Best Overall Under ₹40k Motorola Edge 70 Pro ₹37,985 The highest AnTuTu here, a versatile triple-50MP camera with telephoto, and clean software, the most complete package.
Best Camera Under ₹40k Motorola Edge 70 Pro ₹37,985 The only phone here with a genuine 50MP periscope telephoto and 3.5x optical zoom, backed by a triple 50MP system.
Best Gaming / Performance POCO X8 Pro ₹36,999 The highest GPU score here at 14,055 and the strongest Genshin frame floor of the fast phones.
Best Battery & Charging OnePlus Nord CE6 ₹35,999 24h 36min on PCMark, the longest result in this comparison.
Best Display (AMOLED / High-Refresh) Redmi Turbo 5 ₹37,980 The brightest measured panel here at 2,430 nits with a 144Hz AMOLED.
Best Value-For-Money Realme GT 7T ₹38,900 Flagship-adjacent performance and a 7,000mAh battery at one of the sharpest prices in this bracket.
Best For Clean Software & Updates Nothing Phone 4a ₹37,849 Clean Nothing OS with six years of security patches, the longest support commitment in this group.

Under-₹40k Specs And Benchmark Comparison

A 🏆 marks the category leader.

Test / Metric Moto Edge 70 Pro POCO X8 Pro OnePlus Nord CE6 Redmi Turbo 5 Realme GT 7T
AnTuTu Overall 2,163,322 🏆 2,083,072 1,162,700 2,002,211 2,127,058
Geekbench (Single) 1,722 1,740 🏆 1,072 1,523 1,595
Geekbench (Multi) 6,688 6,705 🏆 3,171 6,526 6,248
Geekbench GPU 12,557 14,055 🏆 3,582 13,251 10,895
3DMark Wild Life Extreme 4,387 🏆 4,232 1,113 3,616 4,094
3DMark Stress Stability 47.6% 69.3% 99.2% 🏆 91.1% 73.3%
Peak Temperature 39.8°C 42.1°C 37.5°C 42.5°C 42.8°C
PCMark Battery 16h 17min 16h 46min 24h 36min 🏆 18h 41min 18h 22min
Peak Brightness (measured, auto) N/A N/A 1,620 nits 2,430 nits 🏆 1,657 nits
Genshin Impact (Avg / 5% Low) 59.7 / 56.3 🏆 59.7 / 54.0 57.0 / 37.3 59.2 / 47.6 38.7 / 12.5

How I Tested These Smartphones

Every phone was tested using the same methodology, so results reflect real behaviour rather than marketing claims.

Test Conditions: All devices are retail units running publicly available software, tested at a controlled 28°C ambient temperature, on the highest-specification variant where one exists.

Performance: AnTuTu v10 and Geekbench 6 for CPU and GPU, run three times with a fifteen-minute cooldown and the median reported.

Sustained Load: 3DMark Wild Life Extreme across twenty consecutive loops, with chassis temperature logged by external probe.

Gaming: BGMI, Minecraft, Genshin Impact and Asphalt 9 in extended sessions with frame-time logging. Average FPS describes the session; 5% Low describes its worst moments.

Battery: PCMark Work 3.0 at fixed brightness until shutdown.

The Phones In Detail

Motorola Edge 70 Pro — Best Overall & Best Camera Under ₹40k

The Edge 70 Pro is the most complete phone in this comparison, leading on raw performance while offering the most versatile camera and cleanest software here.

Why We Picked It

The Edge 70 Pro takes both overall and camera because it is the rare phone at this price that compromises on very little. It posted the highest AnTuTu score here at 2,163,322 and the best 3DMark result at 4,387, and it pairs that with the most capable camera system in this group, a triple 50MP array anchored by a genuine 50MP periscope telephoto with 3.5x optical zoom, a feature none of its rivals here offer. Independent reviews back this up, praising its detail-rich daytime shots and strong zoom while noting weaker low-light video. Its near-stock software is clean and fast. The one real caveat is thermal: its 47.6% stress stability is the lowest of the recommended phones, and its BGMI 5% low collapsed to 8.2fps under sustained load, so it is not the phone for marathon gaming sessions despite its strong peak scores.

Motorola Edge 70 Pro Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹37,985
  • Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 8450
  • Display: 6.7-inch pOLED, 144Hz, 4,500 nits peak (claimed)
  • Dimensions & Weight: 161.8 x 73.9 x 5.99 mm, 179g
  • RAM: 8GB / 12GB
  • Storage: 256GB / 512GB
  • Battery: 6,500 mAh (silicon-carbon)
  • Charging: 90W wired, 15W wireless
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main (Sony LYTIA 710) + 50MP periscope telephoto (3.5x) + 50MP ultra-wide
  • Front Camera: 50MP
  • IP Rating: IP68 / IP69

Motorola Edge 70 Pro XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 16h 17min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~2h 30min (16h 17min ÷ 6,500mAh)
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: 2,163,322
  • Geekbench 6: 1,722 (Single-Core) / 6,688 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 12,557
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,387
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 47.6%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 73%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 39.8°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 111.4 average / 82 5% low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 62.9 average / 44 5% low FPS

Pros

The highest benchmark scores here, the only genuine optical telephoto in this group, clean near-stock software, a slim IP68/69 build, and consistent Genshin frame-time performance.

Cons

The lowest stress stability of the recommended phones, a severe BGMI frame-time collapse under sustained load, and only three years of OS updates.

Who Should Buy It

Buyers who want the most complete package under ₹40,000, strong performance, the best camera versatility, and clean software.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Marathon gamers, whose long BGMI sessions will expose its frame-time instability.

Expert Verdict: The most well-rounded phone under ₹40,000, and the camera to beat here thanks to its telephoto. Its sustained-gaming behaviour is the one real weakness in an otherwise excellent package.

POCO X8 Pro — Best Gaming / Performance Under ₹40k

The X8 Pro is the gaming pick, holding strong frame rates under load where its rivals falter.

Why We Picked It

The X8 Pro takes gaming on the strength of its GPU and its consistency. It posted the highest Geekbench GPU score in this comparison at 14,055, and in Genshin Impact it held a 59.7fps average with a 54.0fps 5% low, one of the most stable sustained results in the group, meaning very few frame drops in one of the most demanding titles available. Its 4,232 3DMark and 2,083,072 AnTuTu place it right behind the Edge 70 Pro on raw performance. It runs warm at 42.1°C and its 69.3% stability is mid-pack, so it is not the coolest phone here, but for a buyer whose priority is holding frame rates in heavy games, none of the others match its combination of GPU power and consistency.

POCO X8 Pro Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹36,999
  • Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra
  • Display: 6.59-inch 1.5K AMOLED, 120Hz, 3,500 nits peak (claimed)
  • RAM: 8GB / 12GB LPDDR5X
  • Storage: 256GB UFS 4.1
  • Battery: 6,500 mAh
  • Charging: 100W wired
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main (OIS) + 8MP ultra-wide
  • Front Camera: 20MP

POCO X8 Pro XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 16h 46min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~2h 35min
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: 2,083,072
  • Geekbench 6: 1,740 (Single-Core) / 6,705 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 14,055
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,232
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 69.3%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 83%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 42.1°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 96.6 average / 58.5 low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 58.7 average / 42.7 low FPS

Pros

The highest GPU score in this comparison, excellent Genshin frame-time consistency, strong all-round performance, and fast 100W charging.

Cons

Runs warm under load, mid-pack stress stability, and a short battery result relative to the leaders.

Who Should Buy It

Gamers who want the most GPU power and the most consistent frame rates in demanding titles under ₹40,000.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Buyers who prioritise battery life or cool operation over gaming performance.

Expert Verdict: The gaming pick here, with the best GPU and the steadiest heavy-game frame rates. It runs warm and its battery is ordinary, but for sustained gaming it is the one to get.

OnePlus Nord CE6 — Best Battery & Charging Under ₹40k

The Nord CE6 is the endurance champion of this comparison, and it holds its performance rock-steady too.

Why We Picked It

The Nord CE6 recorded 24 hours 36 minutes on PCMark, the longest result of any phone in this comparison, and backed it with a 99.2% stress stability figure, one of the highest here, meaning it holds its performance without spiking and collapsing. It also ran cool at 37.5°C. The trade-off is raw power: its 1,162,700 AnTuTu and 3,582 GPU are near the bottom of this group, so it is not a performance phone. Its Genshin 5% low of 37.3fps and Asphalt low of 12.3fps show it struggles under heavy GPU load. But for a buyer whose top priority is a phone that simply lasts, nothing here comes close to its endurance.

OnePlus Nord CE6 Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹35,999
  • Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7400
  • Display: 6.7-inch AMOLED, 120Hz
  • RAM: 8GB / 12GB
  • Storage: 128GB / 256GB
  • Battery: 7,100 mAh (approx.)
  • Charging: 80W wired
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main (OIS) + 8MP ultra-wide
  • Front Camera: 16MP

OnePlus Nord CE6 XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 18h 41min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~3h 28min
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: ~1,162,700
  • Geekbench 6: 1,072 (Single-Core) / 3,171 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 3,582
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,113
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 99.2%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 89%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 37.5°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 89.6 average / 83.6 low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 42.2 average / 29.8 low FPS

Pros

The longest battery life in this comparison, excellent stress stability, cool thermals, and a clean OxygenOS experience.

Cons

The weakest performance of the recommended phones, and poor sustained gaming under heavy GPU load.

Who Should Buy It

Buyers whose top priority is battery endurance and who use their phone for everyday tasks rather than demanding games.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Gamers and performance-focused users, this is among the slowest phones in the comparison.

Expert Verdict: The battery champion of this guide. It gives up performance to get there, but if endurance is what you want, nothing here lasts longer.

Redmi Turbo 5 — Best Display (AMOLED / High-Refresh) Under ₹40k

The Turbo 5 pairs the brightest display here with strong performance and stability.

Why We Picked It

The Turbo 5 takes the display award with the brightest measured panel in this comparison at 2,430 nits, on a 144Hz AMOLED, noticeably brighter than the Realme GT 7T (1,657) and Nord CE6 (1,620). It is more than a screen, though: it posted a 2,002,211 AnTuTu, a strong 13,251 GPU score (second only to the POCO), and held a 91.1% stress stability, the best of the genuinely fast phones here. It runs warm at 42.5°C, and one gaming figure needs context (see notes), but as a bright, capable all-rounder it is one of the most balanced phones in this guide.

Redmi Turbo 5 Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹37,980
  • Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Ultra
  • Display: 6.83-inch AMOLED, 144Hz, high peak brightness
  • RAM: 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X
  • Storage: 256GB / 512GB
  • Battery: 7,000 mAh (approx.)
  • Charging: 90W wired
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main (OIS) + 8MP ultra-wide
  • Front Camera: 20MP

Redmi Turbo 5 XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 18h 41min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~2h 40min
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: 2,002,211
  • Geekbench 6: 1,523 (Single-Core) / 6,526 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 13,251
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,616
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 91.1%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 70%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 42.5°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 116.5 average / 92.5 low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 64.1 average / 47.9 low FPS

Pros

The brightest measured display in this comparison, strong GPU performance, the best stress stability of the fast phones, and a large battery.

Cons

Runs warm under load, and one gaming figure appears frame-generated (see notes).

Who Should Buy It

Buyers who want the brightest, most vivid display alongside strong all-round performance and stability.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Anyone who wants the coolest-running phone here, or the outright highest GPU power, the POCO leads there.

Expert Verdict: A bright, balanced all-rounder that holds its performance well. Its display leads the group, and its stability is among the best of the fast phones here.

Realme GT 7T — Best Value-For-Money Under ₹40k

The GT 7T delivers flagship-adjacent performance and a huge battery at one of the sharpest prices here.

Why We Picked It

The GT 7T earns the value award by pairing genuinely strong performance with a large battery at a competitive price. It posted a 2,127,058 AnTuTu, the second-highest here, a 10,895 GPU score, and a 4,094 3DMark, figures that place it firmly among the fast phones in this group. Its 7,000mAh battery delivered 18h 22min on PCMark. The catch is sustained gaming: its Genshin 5% low collapsed to 12.5fps against a 38.7fps average, and its 73.3% stability is mid-pack, so it throttles noticeably under heavy load. For everyday use and short sessions that rarely surfaces, and at this price the raw performance-per-rupee is hard to beat.

Realme GT 7T Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹38,900
  • Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Max
  • Display: 6.8-inch AMOLED, 144Hz
  • Dimensions & Weight: 162.4 x 76 mm, 202g
  • RAM: 8GB / 12GB LPDDR5X
  • Storage: 256GB / 512GB
  • Battery: 7,000 mAh
  • Charging: 120W wired
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main (OIS) + 8MP ultra-wide
  • Front Camera: 16MP

Realme GT 7T XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 18h 22min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~2h 37min (18h 22min ÷ 7,000mAh)
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: 2,127,058
  • Geekbench 6: 1,595 (Single-Core) / 6,248 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 10,895
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,094
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 73.3%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 68%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 42.8°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 96.5 average / 81.2 low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 58.1 average / 39.7 low FPS

Pros

The second-highest AnTuTu here, strong GPU performance, a large 7,000mAh battery, very fast 120W charging, and a competitive price.

Cons

Severe Genshin frame-time collapse under sustained load, mid-pack stability, and a warm peak temperature.

Who Should Buy It

Value-focused buyers who want strong performance and battery life for the money and whose gaming is in shorter sessions.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Long-session gamers of demanding titles, its frame-time consistency falls away under heavy load.

Expert Verdict: The value pick of this guide. Its sustained gaming is inconsistent, but for the price it delivers performance and battery that are hard to match.

Nothing Phone 4a — Best For Clean Software & Updates Under ₹40k

The Nothing Phone 4a pairs a clean, distinctive software experience with the longest support commitment in this group.

Why We Picked It

The Nothing Phone 4a takes the software award on the strength of Nothing OS and its update policy, six years of security patches, the longest commitment of any phone in this comparison and a year more than the Motorola alternative. Nothing OS itself is clean, fast and distinctive, with the Glyph interface. On performance it is a tier below the leaders, with a 1,435,113 AnTuTu and 2,093 3DMark, but it holds what it has extremely well: a 99.3% stress stability and the coolest peak temperature of the recommended phones at 34.3°C. Its BGMI result of 105.8fps is genuinely strong for its class, though it falls away in heavier titles. For a buyer who values clean software, long support and a distinctive design over raw speed, it is the pick.

Nothing Phone 4a Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹37,849
  • Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro
  • Display: 6.7-inch AMOLED, 120Hz
  • RAM: 8GB
  • Storage: 128GB / 256GB
  • Battery: 5,000 mAh (approx.)
  • Charging: Wired fast charging
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main + 8MP ultra-wide
  • Front Camera: 32MP
  • Software Support: 3 years OS updates / 6 years security patches

Nothing Phone 4a XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 16h 10min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~3h 14min (16h 10min ÷ 5,000mAh)
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: 1,435,113
  • Geekbench 6: 1,378 (Single-Core) / 4,313 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 4,597
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,093
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 99.3%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 84%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 34.3°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 105.8 average / 82.4 low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 35.1 average / 19.2 low FPS

Pros

The longest security-patch support here, clean and distinctive Nothing OS, excellent stress stability, the coolest thermals of the recommended phones, and a bright display.

Cons

Modest performance, short battery life, and weak sustained gaming in heavy titles.

Who Should Buy It

Buyers who value clean software, long-term updates and a distinctive design over raw performance.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Performance and battery-focused buyers, several phones here offer more of both.

Expert Verdict: The software and longevity pick under ₹40,000. Its performance is a tier below the leaders, but its clean OS, cool running and six-year patch commitment give it a real identity here.

Realme 15 Pro

The Realme 15 Pro is a stable, cool-enough all-rounder that lands just behind the category winners.

Why We Didn’t Pick It

The Realme 15 Pro is a solid phone that missed an award in a crowded field. It posted a 1,093,744 AnTuTu and a 1,785 3DMark, placing it in the lower-mid of this group, with a strong 98.4% stress stability. But it is out-argued in each category: the Edge 70 Pro and POCO are far faster for overall and gaming, the Nord CE6 lasts longer, and the Turbo 5 has a brighter display. Its 22h 03min battery is genuinely good, third-longest here, but its gaming falls away under load, with a Genshin 5% low of 19.9fps. A capable phone that simply meets stiffer competition.

Realme 15 Pro Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹35,999
  • Processor: Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
  • Display: 6.8-inch AMOLED, 144Hz
  • Dimensions & Weight: 162.26 x 76.1 mm, 187g
  • RAM: 8GB / 12GB
  • Storage: 128GB / 256GB
  • Battery: 7,000 mAh
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main (OIS) + 8MP ultra-wide
  • Front Camera: 50MP

Realme 15 Pro XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 22h 03min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~3h 9min (22h 03min ÷ 7,000mAh)
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: 1,093,744
  • Geekbench 6: 1,207 (Single-Core) / 3,556 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 4,497
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,785
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 98.4%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 90%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 42°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 87.1 average / 68.2 low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 38.5 average / 25.5 low FPS

Pros

Strong stress stability, long battery life, a 50MP selfie camera, and a bright 144Hz display.

Cons

Modest performance, weak sustained gaming, and no category where it beats the winners.

Who Should Buy It

Buyers who want a stable, long-lasting phone with a good selfie camera and are not chasing performance.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Gamers and performance-focused buyers, faster phones sit at this price.

Expert Verdict: A capable, stable all-rounder out-argued at this price. Its battery and stability are real strengths; its performance is mid-pack.

Realme 16

The Realme 16 is exceptionally cool and stable, but too slow to recommend against this field.

Why We Didn’t Pick It

The Realme 16 posted the lowest 3DMark score here at 382 and a 617,726 AnTuTu near the bottom of the group. Its stability figures are outstanding, 99.2% stress stability and the coolest peak here at 30.6°C, but as with several phones in this bracket, there is little performance for that stability to protect. Its gaming is the weakest in the comparison, with an Asphalt 9 5% low of 8.2fps indicating severe frame collapse. Its 22h 09min battery is a genuine strength, and its 782-nit measured brightness is the dimmest here. At ₹38,989 it is out-performed by cheaper, faster phones in this guide.

Realme 16 Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹38,989
  • Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  • Display: 6.7-inch AMOLED, 120Hz
  • RAM: 8GB / 12GB
  • Storage: 128GB / 256GB
  • Battery: 6,000 mAh (approx.)
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main + 8MP ultra-wide
  • Front Camera: 16MP

Realme 16 XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 22h 09min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~3h 10min (22h 09min ÷ 7,000mAh)
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: 617,726
  • Geekbench 6: 810 (Single-Core) / 2,064 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 1,424
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 382
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 99.2%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 92%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 30.6°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 59.7 average / 57.7 low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 59.3 average / 46.8 low FPS

Pros

The coolest peak temperature here, excellent stress stability, and long battery life.

Cons

The weakest performance and gaming in this comparison, and the dimmest display here.

Who Should Buy It

Buyers who want a cool, stable, long-lasting phone purely for everyday tasks.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Anyone who games or wants a bright display, better options sit at this price.

Expert Verdict: Superb thermals and battery around very modest hardware. At this price, faster phones make it hard to recommend.

Redmi Note 15

The Redmi Note 15 is stable and cool but sits below this field on raw capability.

Why We Didn’t Pick It

The Redmi Note 15 posted an 834,308 AnTuTu and an 861 3DMark near the bottom of this group. Like its siblings it excels on consistency, 99.5% stability and a cool 36.6°C, but has little performance to hold. Its gaming is weak, with a Genshin 5% low of 25.2fps and an Asphalt low of 20.8fps. Its 5,520mAh battery delivered a mid-pack 17h 53min, and its 1,335-nit measured brightness is among the dimmest here. As the cheapest phone in this guide it has a value angle, but the Realme GT 7T and Redmi Turbo 5 offer far more performance for a small step up.

Redmi Note 15 Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹31,998
  • Processor: Snapdragon 6-series
  • Display: 6.77-inch AMOLED, 3,200 nits peak (claimed)
  • Dimensions & Weight: 164 x 75.42 x 7.35 mm, 178g
  • RAM: 8GB
  • Storage: 128GB / 256GB
  • Battery: 5,520 mAh
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main + secondary camera
  • Front Camera: Selfie camera

Redmi Note 15 XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 17h 53min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~3h 14min (17h 53min ÷ 5,520mAh)
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: 834,308
  • Geekbench 6: 1,018 (Single-Core) / 2,964 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 2,093
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 861
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 99.5%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 94%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 36.6°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 58.2 average / 50.2 low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 37.0 average / 19.7 low FPS

Pros

The lowest price in this guide, excellent stress stability, and cool thermals.

Cons

Weak performance and gaming, a mid-pack battery for the capacity, and a dim measured display.

Who Should Buy It

Budget buyers who want a cool, stable phone for everyday tasks at the lowest price here.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Anyone who games or wants strong performance, a small step up buys far more.

Expert Verdict: The cheapest phone here, stable and cool but modest. For a little more, the GT 7T or Turbo 5 offer substantially more phone.

Infinix Note 60 Pro

The Note 60 Pro is cool, bright and stable, but its raw performance holds it back.

Why We Didn’t Pick It

The Infinix Note 60 Pro posted a 940,152 AnTuTu and an 1,184 3DMark, in the lower half of this group. It has real strengths, the highest stress stability here at 99.7%, the coolest running of the entire comparison at 30.2°C, and a bright 2,400-nit measured display that nearly matches the Turbo 5. But its performance is modest and its gaming falls away under load, with a Genshin 5% low of 21.3fps. Its 16h 10min battery is among the shortest here. Reviewers rate its camera and design well, but on the lab data it is out-performed by faster phones at a similar price, and it takes no award as a result.

Infinix Note 60 Pro Key Specifications

  • Price: ₹35,999
  • Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  • Display: 6.78-inch AMOLED, 144Hz
  • RAM: 8GB / 12GB
  • Storage: 128GB / 256GB
  • Battery: 5,160 mAh (approx.)
  • Rear Camera: 50MP main (OIS) + 8MP ultra-wide
  • Front Camera: 13MP

Infinix Note 60 Pro XP Lab Test Data

  • Battery Life (PCMark): 16h 10min
  • Runtime per 1,000 mAh: ~3h 8min (16h 10min ÷ 5,160mAh)
  • AnTuTu Overall Score: 940,152
  • Geekbench 6: 1,240 (Single-Core) / 3,400 (Multi-Core)
  • Geekbench GPU Score: 3,654
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,184
  • 3DMark Stress Test Stability: 99.7%
  • CPU Throttling Test Stability: 94%
  • Temperature After Stress Test: 30.2°C
  • BGMI Performance (Lowest Graphics): 82.1 average / 58.6 low FPS
  • Minecraft Performance (Highest Graphics): 33.1 average / 24.2 low FPS

Pros

The highest stress stability and coolest thermals in this comparison, and a bright display.

Cons

Modest performance, weak sustained gaming, and short battery life.

Who Should Buy It

Buyers who want a cool, bright, stable phone and prioritise design over performance.

Who Shouldn’t Buy It

Gamers and performance-focused buyers, faster phones sit at this price.

Expert Verdict: Excellent thermals and a bright screen around modest hardware. On the numbers, faster rivals at this price keep it off the podium.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Which is the best phone under ₹40,000 overall?

The Motorola Edge 70 Pro. It posted the highest AnTuTu and 3DMark scores in this comparison, offers the most versatile camera here thanks to its 50MP periscope telephoto, and runs clean near-stock software. Its only real weakness is sustained-gaming frame-time stability.

Which phone under ₹40,000 has the best camera?

Again the Motorola Edge 70 Pro. It is the only phone in this comparison with a genuine optical telephoto, a 50MP periscope with 3.5x zoom, backed by a triple 50MP system. Independent reviews praise its daytime detail and zoom, with the caveat that low-light video is weaker.

Which phone under ₹40,000 has the best battery life?

The OnePlus Nord CE6, which recorded 24 hours 36 minutes on PCMark, the longest result in this comparison. It gives up performance to get there, but nothing here lasts longer.

Which is the best gaming phone under ₹40,000?

The POCO X8 Pro, thanks to the highest GPU score here and the most consistent Genshin Impact frame rates. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a strong alternative with better stability, and the Realme GT 7T offers more raw AnTuTu but throttles harder under sustained load.

Which phone under ₹40,000 gets the longest software support?

The Nothing Phone 4a, with six years of security patches, a year more than the Motorola alternative, alongside clean Nothing OS. For buyers who keep phones a long time, that longevity is a real advantage.

Why Trust XpertPick

Every recommendation on this page comes from hands-on lab testing rather than manufacturer spec sheets or marketing claims. This comparison was built on retail units running shipping software.

Independent testing: All ten phones were tested in-house on retail units; no manufacturer-supplied performance data was used in the analysis.

Standardised conditions: Every device was tested at 28°C ambient, on the highest-specification variant available, using the same benchmark, stress, gaming and battery suites.

Layered methodology: Peak output, sustained load, logged real-world gaming and battery rundowns are measured for every phone, because at this price the same chipset behaves very differently across devices.

No posts to display